Editorial & Tax Content Review Policy
Tax content is only worth reading if you know who stands behind it and where it comes from. This page sets out exactly how ours is written, reviewed, sourced and dated — including what we deliberately do not claim.
Last updated
The short version
EvoTax writes its own tax content. Pages that make a substantive tax claim are reviewed by a credentialled professional for the relevant country, name that reviewer on the page, and carry a visible review date. Factual statements cite primary sources — the IRS, FinCEN, the US Treasury, the Indian Income Tax Department or the statute itself — rather than secondary reporting. Where the law is genuinely unsettled we say so instead of picking an answer.
Who writes and who reviews
Content is authored by EvoTax as a firm rather than credited to an individual byline, because it is professional output rather than personal commentary. Review is different: it is attributed to a named, credentialled person, because someone has to be accountable for a tax claim.
Credentials are not interchangeable across countries, and we do not treat them as though they are. A Chartered Accountant is qualified for Indian tax and is not authorised to practise before the IRS; unlimited representation rights before the IRS require a CPA, an Enrolled Agent or an attorney. So US pages are reviewed by our US-credentialled professional and India pages by our Chartered Accountants, and neither is listed as reviewing the other's work.
- Teja K, CPA — US content. Form 1040 and 1040-NR preparation, residency determination, dual-status years and foreign account reporting.
- CA Suresh, Chartered Accountant — India content. Income tax return filing, tax planning, assessments and notice handling.
- CA Deepak, Chartered Accountant — India content. GST registration & returns, TDS, and company/ROC compliance.
- CA Nageshwar Rao, Chartered Accountant — India content. Capital gains, F&O/trader taxation and tax audit.
Reviewer attribution appears in two places on every page that carries it: as visible text near the sources, and inside the page's structured data as a reviewedBy property. Full profiles are on our US tax team and our India team pages.
How to verify our credentials yourself
You should not have to take our word for it, and you do not need to. CPA licensure is issued by state boards and is publicly checkable through CPAverify or the relevant state board's licence lookup. Anyone paid to prepare a US federal return must hold a PTIN.
We will provide the reviewing professional's licence details and PTIN on request before you engage us. We do not publish them on the site, because a preparer identifier posted publicly is an invitation to misuse — but withholding them from a prospective client would be a different matter, and we do not do that. Ask, and you will get them.
What we cite
Factual claims trace to a primary source, and the sources are listed on the page so you can check them rather than trust us. In practice that means IRS guidance, publications and forms; FinCEN for FBAR; the US Treasury for exchange rates; the Internal Revenue Code and the India-US tax treaty text; the Indian Income Tax Department and the GST portal for Indian content; and court decisions where a point turns on one.
We do not cite other tax firms' blog posts, content farms or AI-generated summaries as authority for a factual claim. Where a secondary source is genuinely useful for context, it is described as such.
How we handle unsettled law
Some cross-border questions do not have a settled answer, and pretending otherwise is the most damaging thing a tax site can do. Where practitioners genuinely disagree, we say that the point is contested, set out the positions, and explain which facts the answer turns on.
The clearest example on this site is the US treatment of Indian provident fund income — EPF and PPF. Whether the annual accretion is currently taxable on a US return is genuinely unresolved, because the India-US treaty contains no article that plainly defers it. Our pages state that, and separate it from the reporting question, which is far more clear-cut. We would rather tell you where the uncertainty sits than assert a position we cannot support.
Figures we deliberately leave out
Tax numbers go stale on a schedule, and a confidently wrong figure is worse than no figure. So structural pages — the ones explaining how a rule works rather than what this year's number is — deliberately omit amounts that are adjusted annually. Penalty caps are the clearest case: they are inflation-adjusted every year, so we describe them qualitatively instead of quoting a number that will be wrong by next season.
Where a figure genuinely matters — tax brackets, the standard deduction, filing deadlines, state rates — it lives on a page that names its tax year, carries its own review date, and is updated as part of a scheduled pre-season refresh.
Review dates, and why they are real
Every page making a substantive tax claim shows when it was last reviewed, as a machine-readable date rather than a decorative label. A review date means a credentialled professional checked the page against current guidance on that date — not that a file was touched.
Those dates are also checked automatically. Our build asserts that the date shown on a page matches the date published for it in the sitemap, and fails if they diverge. A page claiming one review date to readers and another to search engines is a contradiction we would rather catch in the build than in production.
Corrections
If you think something here is wrong, please tell us — particularly if you can point at the guidance we have misread. Email info@evotaxes.com with the page URL and what you believe is incorrect.
Where a correction changes the substance of a page we update the page and move its review date forward. Where it changes a fact that other pages depend on, we correct those too rather than leaving the site internally inconsistent.
What this content is not
Everything published here is general information. It is not tax advice for your situation, because your situation contains facts we cannot see from a web page — residency days, visa history, what you hold abroad, what was reported in previous years. Tax outcomes turn on exactly those facts.
We make no guarantees about refund amounts, tax savings or audit outcomes, and we do not publish claims we cannot evidence. Our full disclaimer sets out the limits of our services, and our privacy policy covers how we handle your documents.